How we work
Clarity is part
of the story.
Our goal is to make space science understandable while keeping the evidence and its limits visible.
Our process
Our workflow uses AI assistance for research and writing, alongside automated checks for structure and common issues. GreenSpacealien Editorial is responsible for published content; automated checks do not establish scientific accuracy.
Evidence and context
Published stories list the sources used to support their claims. We favor primary research and official mission or agency material when it is available, and use context to explain what a finding does and does not establish.
News and explanation
We aim to distinguish reported findings from background explanation and editorial interpretation. A possibility, forecast, or early result should not be presented as a settled discovery.
Dates and updates
Stories show publication dates when available. Substantive revisions should carry an updated date so readers can see when a story has changed.
Corrections
If a story contains an error, we will correct it and describe the change when it materially affects the meaning. See our corrections page to learn how to flag an issue.
Editorial byline: GreenSpacealien Editorial.